<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balsamiq vs. HTML Wireframes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slicedbreaddesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/balsamiq-vs-html-wireframes-head-to-head/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slicedbreaddesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/balsamiq-vs-html-wireframes-head-to-head/</link>
	<description>an experience design blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:37:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.slicedbreaddesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/balsamiq-vs-html-wireframes-head-to-head/comment-page-1/#comment-2550</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slicedbreaddesign.com/?p=361#comment-2550</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by marthavalenta: balsamiq vs HTML wireframes http://slicedbreaddesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/balsamiq-vs-html-wireframes-head-to-head/...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by marthavalenta: balsamiq vs HTML wireframes <a href="http://slicedbreaddesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/balsamiq-vs-html-wireframes-head-to-head/..." rel="nofollow">http://slicedbreaddesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/balsamiq-vs-html-wireframes-head-to-head/&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Thuma</title>
		<link>http://www.slicedbreaddesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/balsamiq-vs-html-wireframes-head-to-head/comment-page-1/#comment-2539</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Thuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slicedbreaddesign.com/?p=361#comment-2539</guid>
		<description>Balsamiq Mockups is great ... One can use it from the first minute on ... self explaining...

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balsamiq Mockups is great &#8230; One can use it from the first minute on &#8230; self explaining&#8230;</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Efraim</title>
		<link>http://www.slicedbreaddesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/balsamiq-vs-html-wireframes-head-to-head/comment-page-1/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Efraim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slicedbreaddesign.com/?p=361#comment-463</guid>
		<description>I love Balsamiq mockups! Use it almost weekly!
However, software UI tools don&#039;t seem to solve the &#039;first ideas&#039; or &#039;napkin drawings&#039;. For some reason, I can&#039;t bring in software until the idea is a little more clear, since all UI software (incl. Balsamiq) only allow pre-set controls. 

To solve the early stages, I use:
http://www.MockupMagnets.com
Very fun magnetic UI widgets for prototyping on a whiteboard. You should try them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Balsamiq mockups! Use it almost weekly!<br />
However, software UI tools don&#8217;t seem to solve the &#8216;first ideas&#8217; or &#8216;napkin drawings&#8217;. For some reason, I can&#8217;t bring in software until the idea is a little more clear, since all UI software (incl. Balsamiq) only allow pre-set controls. </p>
<p>To solve the early stages, I use:<br />
<a href="http://www.MockupMagnets.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MockupMagnets.com</a><br />
Very fun magnetic UI widgets for prototyping on a whiteboard. You should try them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://www.slicedbreaddesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/balsamiq-vs-html-wireframes-head-to-head/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slicedbreaddesign.com/?p=361#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Agree 100% that these &quot;sketchy&quot; type mockups allow the initial test sessions to bypass any rat-holes centered on colors, fonts, etc.  The point being - it is obvious to the tester that what they are looking at is an initial sketch and not finalized in any way.

For those of us Visio users, a similar option is the GUUUI sketch shapes available at:
http://www.guuui.com/issues/02_07.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree 100% that these &#8220;sketchy&#8221; type mockups allow the initial test sessions to bypass any rat-holes centered on colors, fonts, etc.  The point being &#8211; it is obvious to the tester that what they are looking at is an initial sketch and not finalized in any way.</p>
<p>For those of us Visio users, a similar option is the GUUUI sketch shapes available at:<br />
<a href="http://www.guuui.com/issues/02_07.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.guuui.com/issues/02_07.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor Jese</title>
		<link>http://www.slicedbreaddesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/balsamiq-vs-html-wireframes-head-to-head/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor Jese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slicedbreaddesign.com/?p=361#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Good reading Andrew. Just a small correction here - MockupScreens primarily does a rough looking prototypes, nice &quot;Windows&quot; like look and feel is just an option (you switch skins on the fly depending on how you want your mock-ups to look like).

What I couldn&#039;t agree more is that you better start with rough (black and white, hand-drawn) prototypes. Otherwise you very soon either 1) discuss interface details most of the time or 2) have a user who thinks your app is almost done, there is just &quot;some tweaking under the hood&quot; left.

Igor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good reading Andrew. Just a small correction here &#8211; MockupScreens primarily does a rough looking prototypes, nice &#8220;Windows&#8221; like look and feel is just an option (you switch skins on the fly depending on how you want your mock-ups to look like).</p>
<p>What I couldn&#8217;t agree more is that you better start with rough (black and white, hand-drawn) prototypes. Otherwise you very soon either 1) discuss interface details most of the time or 2) have a user who thinks your app is almost done, there is just &#8220;some tweaking under the hood&#8221; left.</p>
<p>Igor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Schechterman</title>
		<link>http://www.slicedbreaddesign.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/balsamiq-vs-html-wireframes-head-to-head/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Schechterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slicedbreaddesign.com/?p=361#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Balsamiq is terrific, readers might also like FlairBuilder. Both very nice tools that serve a really nice middle-ground for iterating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balsamiq is terrific, readers might also like FlairBuilder. Both very nice tools that serve a really nice middle-ground for iterating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
